One of the many bizarre details about the alleged Paul Pelosi attack is that there is no security footage being released to the general public.
Initial reports from several media outlets claimed that Pelosi had no security cameras, which is ridiculous since Nancy Pelosi is third in line to be President.
Attorney Harmeet Dhillon debunked the absurd claims three days ago:
In one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the United States, no reasonable person could believe that there is no security footage, if not from the Pelosi security cameras, then surely from a neighbor’s.
Or how about the body-cam footage at least? Will those be made public?
Former UFC fighter, Jake Shields, took to Twitter and wrote, “My friend who’s a San Francisco detective just told me Paul Pelosi won’t hand over video footage and they believe he was engaged in gay sex,”, adding, “He isn’t directly working on this case so I can’t confirm reliability”.
The gay sex theory is much more believable than the story the San Francisco police want us to believe. At this point, there are more questions than answers and some could easily be answered by simply releasing the security footage.
In other major crimes that have occurred against a notable person, security footage was released but in the Pelosi case, not only have they not released the footage, but the fake news is also changing the narrative every chance they get.
Five Times August compared this incident to three other similar incidents in which the existence of security footage was extremely likely, yet it was withheld from the public.
The San Francisco police either need to come clean on the real story or the security footage needs to be released if the public is expected to truth any of these individuals.
